Paper detail

SPADE: Sequential-clustering Particle Annihilation via Discrepancy Estimation

For an empirical signed measure $μ= \frac{1}{N} \left(\sum_{i=1}^P δ_{x_i} - \sum_{i=1}^M δ_{y_i}\right)$, particle annihilation (PA) removes $N_A$ particles from both $\{x_i\}_{i=1}^P$ and $\{y_i\}_{i=1}^M$ simultaneously, yielding another empirical signed measure $ν$ such that $\int f d ν$ approximates to $\int f d μ$ within an acceptable accuracy for suitable test functions $f$. Such annihilation of particles carrying opposite importance weights has been extensively utilized for alleviating the numerical sign problem in particle simulations. In this paper, we propose an algorithm for PA in high-dimensional Euclidean space based on hybrid of clustering and matching, dubbed the Sequential-clustering Particle Annihilation via Discrepancy Estimation (SPADE). It consists of two steps: Adaptive clustering of particles via controlling their number-theoretic discrepancies, and independent random matching among positive and negative particles in each cluster. Both deterministic error bounds by the Koksma-Hlawka inequality and non-asymptotic random error bounds by concentration inequalities are proved to be affected by two factors. One factor measures the irregularity of point distributions and reflects their discrete nature. The other relies on the variation of test function and is influenced by the continuity. Only the latter implicitly depends on dimensionality $d$, implying that SPADE can be immune to the curse of dimensionality for a wide class of test functions. Numerical experiments up to $d=1080$ validate our theoretical discoveries.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.