Paper detail

Space Bounds for Reliable Multi-Writer Data Store: Inherent Cost of Read/Write Primitives

Reliable storage emulations from fault-prone components have established themselves as an algorithmic foundation of modern storage services and applications. Most existing reliable storage emulations are built from storage services supporting arbitrary read-modify-write primitives. Since such primitives are not typically exposed by pre-existing or off-the-shelf components (such as cloud storage services or network-attached disks) it is natural to ask if they are indeed essential for efficient storage emulations. In this paper, we answer this question in the affirmative. We show that relaxing the underlying storage to only support read/write operations leads to a linear blow-up in the emulation space requirements. We also show that the space complexity is not adaptive to concurrency, which implies that the storage cannot be reliably reclaimed even in sequential runs. On a positive side, we show that Compare-and-Swap primitives, which are commonly available with many off-the-shelf storage services, can be used to emulate a reliable multi-writer atomic register with constant storage and adaptive time complexity.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.