Paper detail

Source data selection for out-of-domain generalization

Models that perform out-of-domain generalization borrow knowledge from heterogeneous source data and apply it to a related but distinct target task. Transfer learning has proven effective for accomplishing this generalization in many applications. However, poor selection of a source dataset can lead to poor performance on the target, a phenomenon called negative transfer. In order to take full advantage of available source data, this work studies source data selection with respect to a target task. We propose two source selection methods that are based on the multi-bandit theory and random search, respectively. We conduct a thorough empirical evaluation on both simulated and real data. Our proposals can be also viewed as diagnostics for the existence of a reweighted source subsamples that perform better than the random selection of available samples.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.