Paper detail

Source attributions of radiative forcing by regions, sectors, and climate forcers

It is important to understand how the emissions of different regions, sectors, or climate forcers play a role on pathways toward the Paris Agreement temperature targets. There are however methodological challenges for attributing individual contributions due to complexities associated with a variety of climate forcers affecting the climate system on different spatial and temporal scales. Here, we use the latest historical and future emissions data for a comprehensive set of climate forcers as well as land-use datasets and apply the normalized marginal approach to quantify the forcing contributions of regions, sectors and forcing agents toward the 2C and 1.5C targets. We show that most of the worldwide regions and sectors need to maintain forcing levels not higher than present levels to attain the 1.5C target of the Paris Agreement, while slightly higher future forcing levels than present levels are allowed for the 2C target. Our results illustrate the importance of negative CO2 emissions, which contribute -0.75+/-0.44 Wm-2 and -0.42+/-0.27 Wm-2 to the 2C and 1.5C targets. Less negative forcings, or more positive forcings are also identified for the land-use albedo for the 2C and 1.5C scenarios compared to existing studies.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.