Paper detail

Some stochastic inequalities for weighted sums

We compare weighted sums of i.i.d. positive random variables according to the usual stochastic order. The main inequalities are derived using majorization techniques under certain log-concavity assumptions. Specifically, let $Y_i$ be i.i.d. random variables on $\mathbf{R}_+$. Assuming that $\log Y_i$ has a log-concave density, we show that $\sum a_iY_i$ is stochastically smaller than $\sum b_iY_i$, if $(\log a_1,...,\log a_n)$ is majorized by $(\log b_1,...,\log b_n)$. On the other hand, assuming that $Y_i^p$ has a log-concave density for some $p>1$, we show that $\sum a_iY_i$ is stochastically larger than $\sum b_iY_i$, if $(a_1^q,...,a_n^q)$ is majorized by $(b_1^q,...,b_n^q)$, where $p^{-1}+q^{-1}=1$. These unify several stochastic ordering results for specific distributions. In particular, a conjecture of Hitczenko [Sankhyā A 60 (1998) 171--175] on Weibull variables is proved. Potential applications in reliability and wireless communications are mentioned.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.