Paper detail

Some Results on the Improved Bound and Construction of Optimal $(r,δ)$ LRCs

Locally repairable codes (LRCs) with $(r,δ)$ locality were introduced by Prakash \emph{et al.} into distributed storage systems (DSSs) due to their benefit of locally repairing at least $δ-1$ erasures via other $r$ survival nodes among the same local group. An LRC achieving the $(r,δ)$ Singleton-type bound is called an optimal $(r,δ)$ LRC. Constructions of optimal $(r,δ)$ LRCs with longer code length and determining the maximal code length have been an important research direction in coding theory in recent years. In this paper, we conduct further research on the improvement of maximum code length of optimal $(r,δ)$ LRCs. For $2δ+1\leq d\leq 2δ+2$, our upper bounds largely improve the ones by Cai \emph{et al.}, which are tight in some special cases. Moreover, we generalize the results of Chen \emph{et al.} and obtain a complete characterization of optimal $(r=2, δ)$-LRCs in the sense of geometrical existence in the finite projective plane $PG(2,q)$. Within this geometrical characterization, we construct a class of optimal $(r,δ)$ LRCs based on the sunflower structure. Both the construction and upper bounds are better than previous ones.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.