Paper detail

Some Observations on Optimal Frequency Selection in DVFS-based Energy Consumption Minimization

In recent years, the issue of energy consumption in parallel and distributed computing systems has attracted a great deal of attention. In response to this, many energy-aware scheduling algorithms have been developed primarily using the dynamic voltage-frequency scaling (DVFS) capability which has been incorporated into recent commodity processors. Majority of these algorithms involve two passes: schedule generation and slack reclamation. The former pass involves the redistribution of tasks among DVFS-enabled processors based on a given cost function that includes makespan and energy consumption; and, while the latter pass is typically achieved by executing individual tasks with slacks at a lower processor frequency. In this paper, a new slack reclamation algorithm is proposed by approaching the energy reduction problem from a different angle. Firstly, the problem of task slack reclamation by using combinations of processors' frequencies is formulated. Secondly, several proofs are provided to show that (1) if the working frequency set of processor is assumed to be continues, the optimal energy will be always achieved by using only one frequency, (2) for real processors with a discrete set of working frequencies, the optimal energy is always achieved by using at most two frequencies, and (3) these two frequencies are adjacent/neighbouring when processor energy consumption is a convex function of frequency. Thirdly, a novel algorithm to find the best combination of frequencies to result the optimal energy is presented. The presented algorithm has been evaluated based on results obtained from experiments with three different sets of task graphs: 3000 randomly generated task graphs, and 600 task graphs for two popular applications (Gauss-Jordan and LU decomposition). The results show the superiority of the proposed algorithm in comparison with other techniques.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.