Paper detail

Some numerical radius inequalities for semi-Hilbert space operators

Let $A$ be a positive bounded linear operator acting on a complex Hilbert space $\big(\mathcal{H}, \langle \cdot\mid \cdot\rangle \big)$. Let $ω_A(T)$ and ${\|T\|}_A$ denote the $A$-numerical radius and the $A$-operator seminorm of an operator $T$ acting on the semi-Hilbertian space $\big(\mathcal{H}, {\langle \cdot\mid \cdot\rangle}_A\big)$ respectively, where ${\langle x\mid y\rangle}_A := \langle Ax\mid y\rangle$ for all $x, y\in\mathcal{H}$. In this paper, we show that \begin{equation*}\label{m1} \tfrac{1}{4}\|T^{\sharp_A} T+TT^{\sharp_A}\|_A\le ω_A^2\left(T\right) \le \tfrac{1}{2}\|T^{\sharp_A} T+TT^{\sharp_A}\|_A. \end{equation*} Here $T^{\sharp_A}$ is denoted to be a distinguished $A$-adjoint operator of $T$. Moreover, a considerable improvement of the above inequalities is proved. This allows to compute the $\mathbb{A}$-numerical radius of the operator matrix $\begin{pmatrix} I&T \\ 0&-I \end{pmatrix}$ where $\mathbb{A}= \text{diag}(A,A)$. In addition, several $A$-numerical radius inequalities for semi-Hilbertian space operators are also established.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.