Some issues concerning the proton charge radius puzzle

An explanation of the difference of the charge radius of the proton as determined from the Lamb shift in electronic hydrogen and from elastic electron scattering off the proton on the one side and the recent high precision determination with muonic hydrogen on the other side is presented. It is shown that the modification of the $2S_{1/2}$ and $2P_{3/2}$ wave functions by the "Uehling potential" yields a correction to the theoretical Lamb shift of $δ(ΔE_{\textrm{Lamb}}) = 0.302$ meV which has to be compared to $δ(ΔE_{\textrm{Lamb}}) = 0.322(46)$ meV equivalent to the stated radius difference. The explanation is based on the realization that the bound state wave functions modified by the external "Uehling potential" have to be propagated by the vacuum polarization propagator in order to give the correct leading order Lamb shift. It is argued that a conflicting relativistic calculation neglects this propagation aspect. The explanation demonstrates that the Lamb shift is dynamically induced through the QED vacuum polarization and is not only the result of a static external "Uehling potential" probed by a test charge.

No reviews yet.

No comments yet.