Paper detail

Some alternative definitions for the "plus-minus" interpolation spaces $\left\langle A_{0},A_{1}\right\rangle _θ$ of Jaak Peetre

The Peetre "plus-minus" interpolation spaces $\left\langle A_{0},A_{1}\right\rangle _θ$ are defined variously via conditions about the unconditional convergence of certain Banach space valued series whose terms have coefficients which are powers of 2 or, alternatively, powers of $e$. It may seem intuitively obvious that using powers of 2, or of $e$, or powers of some other constant number greater than 1 in such definitions should produce the same space to within equivalence of norms. To allay any doubts, we here offer an explicit proof of this fact, via a "continuous" definition of the same spaces where integrals replace the above mentioned series. This apparently new definition, which is also in some sense a "limiting case" of the above mentioned "discrete" definitions, may be relevant in the study of the connection between the Peetre "plus-minus" interpolation spaces and Calderon complex interpolation spaces when both the spaces of the underlying couple are are Banach lattices on the same measure space. Related results can probably be obtained for the Gustavsson-Peetre variant of the "plus-minus" spaces.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.