Paper detail

Solvent-quality dependent contact formation dynamics in proteins

The mean time of contact formation between two ends of a protein chain shows power law dependence with respect to the number of residues, $τ_{CF} \sim N^α$. Fluorescence quenching measurements based on triplet-triplet energy transfer show variation in the value of scaling exponent $α$ for different protein-solvent systems. Here, starting from a non-Markovian diffusion equation supplemented with an exponential sink term that accounts for the energy transfer reaction between donor and acceptor groups, we calculate the mean time of contact formation using the Wilemski-Fixman closure approximation. The non-Markovian diffusion-reaction equation includes the effects of solvent quality and hydrodynamic interaction in a mean-field fashion. It shows that the contact formation dynamics is mainly governed by two time scales, the reciprocal of the intrinsic rate of quenching $(k_0^{ET})^{-1}$, and the relaxation time $τ_0 = ηb^3/k_B T$ of the coarse-grained residue of an effective size $b$ with solvent viscosity $η$. In the limit of $k_0^{ET} τ_0 \ll 1$, the dominating effect of the reaction-controlled kinetics yields the scaling exponents as $0.89$, $1.47$ and $1.79$ in poor, theta and good solvents respectively. In the opposite limit $k_0^{ET} τ_0 \gg 1$, the dominating influence of the diffusion-controlled kinetics results in $α$ as $1.90$, $2.17$, $2.36$ for a freely-draining and $1.31$, $1.77$, $2.06$ for a non-freely-draining chain in poor, theta and good solvents respectively. In the intermediate limit, $k_0^{ET} τ_0 \approx 1$, the increase in the number of residues switches the kinetics from reaction-controlled at low $N$ to diffusion-controlled at large $N$. These general results suggest that experimental estimates of the scaling exponents reflect solvent-quality dependence of the mean contact formation time in the reaction-controlled limit.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.