Paper detail

Solvation free-energy pressure corrections in the Three Dimensional Reference Interaction Site Model

Solvation free energies are efficiently predicted by molecular density functionnal theory (MDFT) if one corrects the overpressure introduced by the usual homogeneous reference fluid approximation. Sergiievskyi et al. [Sergiievskyi et al., JPCL, 2014, 5, 1935-1942] recently derived the rigorous compensation of this excess of pressure (PC) and proposed an empirical "ideal gas" supplementary correction (PC+) that further enhances the calculated solvation free energies. In a recent paper [Misin et al, JCP, 2015, 142, 091105], those corrections were applied to solvation free energy calculations using the three-dimensional reference interaction site model (3D-RISM). As for classical DFT, PC and PC+ corrections improve greatly the predictions of 3D-RISM, but PC+ is described as decreasing the accuracy. In this article, we first derive rigorously the PC and PC+ corrections for 3D-RISM. We show the reported discrepancy is then taken off by introducing the correct expression of the pressure in 3D-RISM. This provides a consistent way to correct the solvation free-energies calculated by 3D-RISM method.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.