Paper detail

Solvable stationary non equilibrium states

We consider the one dimensional boundary driven harmonic model and its continuous version, both introduced in \cite{FGK}. By combining duality and integrability the authors of \cite{FG} obtained the invariant measures in a combinatorial representation. Here we give an integral representation of the invariant measures which turns out to be a convex combination of inhomogeneous product of geometric distributions for the discrete model and a convex combination of inhomogeneous product of exponential distributions for the continuous one. The mean values of the geometric and of the exponential variables are distributed according to the order statistics of i.i.d. uniform random variables on a suitable interval fixed by the boundary sources. The result is obtained solving exactly the stationary condition written in terms of the joint generating function. The method has an interest in itself and can be generalized to study other models. We briefly discuss some applications.

preprint2024arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.