Paper detail

Software Tool Combining Fault Masking with User-Defined Recovery Strategies

We describe the voting farm, a tool which implements a distributed software voting mechanism for a number of parallel message passing systems. The tool, developed in the framework of EFTOS (Embedded Fault-Tolerant Supercomputing), can be used in stand-alone mode or in conjunction with other EFTOS fault tolerance tools. In the former case, we describe how the mechanism can be exploited, e.g., to implement restoring organs ($N\!$-modular redundancy systems with $N\!$-replicated voters); in the latter case, we show how it is possible for the user to implement in an easy and effective way a number of different recovery strategies via a custom, high-level language. Combining such strategies with the basic fault masking capabilities of the voting tool makes it possible to set up complex fault-tolerant systems such as, for instance, $N$-and-$M$-spare systems or gracefully degrading voting farms. We also report about the impact that our tool can have on reliability, and we show how, besides structural design goals like fault transparency, our tool achieves replication transparency, a high degree of flexibility and ease-of-use, and good performance.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.