Paper detail

Soft Pomeron in the Colour Glass Condensate approach

In this paper we suggest a new approach to the structure of the soft Pomeron: based on the $t$-channel unitarity, we expressed the exchange of the soft Pomeron through the interaction of the dipole of small size of the order of $1/Q_s(Y)$ ($Q_s(Y)$ is the saturation momentum) with the hadrons. Therefore, it is shown that the typical distances in soft processes are small $r \sim 1/Q_s\Lb \h Y \Rb $, where $Y \,=\,ln s$. The saturation momentum, which determines the energy dependence of the scattering amplitude is proportional to $ Q^2_s\Lb \h Y \Rb \propto\,\exp\Lb\h λ\,Y\Rb$, with $λ\approx\,0.2$, and this behaviour is in perfect agreement with phenomenological Donnachie-Landshoff Pomeron. We demonstrate that the saturation models could describe the experimental data for $σ_{tot},σ_{el},σ_{diff} $ and $B_{el}$. Hence our approach is a good first approximation to start discussion of the soft processes in CGC approach on the solid theoretical basis.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.