Paper detail

Small Scale CLTs for the Nodal Length of Monochromatic Waves

We consider the nodal length $L(λ)$ of the restriction to a ball of radius $r_λ$ of a {\it Gaussian pullback monochromatic random wave} of parameter $λ>0$ associated with a Riemann surface $(\mathcal M,g)$ without conjugate points. Our main result is that, if $r_λ$ grows slower than $(\log λ)^{1/25}$, then (as $λ\to \infty$) the length $L(λ)$ verifies a Central Limit Theorem with the same scaling as Berry's random wave model -- as established in Nourdin, Peccati and Rossi (2019). Taking advantage of some powerful extensions of an estimate by Bérard (1986) due to Keeler (2019), our techniques are mainly based on a novel intrinsic bound on the coupling of smooth Gaussian fields, that is of independent interest, and moreover allow us to improve some estimates for the nodal length asymptotic variance of pullback random waves in Canzani and Hanin (2016). In order to demonstrate the flexibility of our approach, we also provide an application to phase transitions for the nodal length of arithmetic random waves on shrinking balls of the $2$-torus.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.