Paper detail

Slow relaxation behavior of cohesive powders

We present findings from uniaxial (oedometric) compression tests on two cohesive industrially relevant granular materials (cocoa and limestone powder). Experimental results are presented for the compressibility, tested with two devices -- the FT4 Powder Rheometer and the custom made lambdameter. We focus on the stress response and the slow relaxation behavior of the cohesive samples tested. After compression ends, at constant volume, the ongoing stress relaxation is found to follow a power law consistently for both cohesive powders and for the different testing equipments. A simple (incremental algebraic evolution) model is proposed for the stress relaxation in cohesive powders, which includes a response timescale along with a second, dimensionless relaxation parameter. The reported observations are useful for both the improvement of discrete element simulations and constitutive macroscopic models for cohesive granular materials.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.