Paper detail

Size Ramsey numbers of stars versus cliques

The size Ramsey number $ \hat{r}(G,H) $ of two graphs $ G $ and $ H $ is the smallest integer $ m $ such that there exists a graph $ F $ on $ m $ edges with the property that every red-blue colouring of the edges of $ F $, yields a red copy of $ G $ or a blue copy of $ H $. In $ 1981 $, Erdős observed that $\hat{r}(K_{1,k},K_{3})\leq \binom{2k+1}{2}-\binom{k}{2}$ and he conjectured that the corresponding upper bound on $ \hat{r}(K_{1,k},K_{3}) $ is sharp. In $ 1983 $, Faudree and Sheehan extended this conjecture as follows: \hat{r}(K_{1,k},K_{n})=\left \{ {lr} \binom{k(n-1)+1}{2}-\binom{k}{2} & ~k\geq n~ \text{or}~ k~ \text{odd}. \binom{k(n-1)+1}{2}-k(n-1)/2 & \text{otherwise}. \right. They proved the case $ k=2 $. In $ 2001 $, Pikhurko showed that this conjecture is not true for $ n=3 $ and $ k\geq 5 $, disproving the mentioned conjecture of Erdős. Here we prove Faudree and Sheehan's conjecture for a given $ k\geq 2 $ and $ n\geq k^{3}+2k^{2}+2k $.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.