Researcher profile

Gholamreza Omidi

Gholamreza Omidi contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
8works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2013arXiv

Strongly walk-regular graphs

We study a generalization of strongly regular graphs. We call a graph strongly walk-regular if there is an $\ell >1$ such that the number of walks of length $\ell$ from a vertex to another vertex depends only on whether the two vertices are the same, adjacent, or not adjacent. We will show that a strongly walk-regular graph must be an empty graph, a complete graph, a strongly regular graph, a disjoint union of complete bipartite graphs of the same size and isolated vertices, or a regular graph with four eigenvalues. Graphs from the first three families in this list are indeed strongly $\ell$-walk-regular for all $\ell$, whereas the graphs from the fourth family are $\ell$-walk-regular for every odd $\ell$. The case of regular graphs with four eigenvalues is the most interesting (and complicated) one. Such graphs cannot be strongly $\ell$-walk-regular for even $\ell$. We will characterize the case that regular four-eigenvalue graphs are strongly $\ell$-walk-regular for every odd $\ell$, in terms of the eigenvalues. There are several examples of infinite families of such graphs. We will show that every other regular four-eigenvalue graph can be strongly $\ell$-walk-regular for at most one $\ell$. There are several examples of infinite families of such graphs that are strongly 3-walk-regular. It however remains open whether there are any graphs that are strongly $\ell$-walk-regular for only one particular $\ell$ different from 3.

preprint2012arXiv

A generalization of Ramsey theory for stars and one matching

A recent question in generalized Ramsey theory is that for fixed positive integers $s\leq t$, at least how many vertices can be covered by the vertices of no more than $s$ monochromatic members of the family $\cal F$ in every edge coloring of $K_n$ with $t$ colors. This is related to {$d$-chromatic Ramsey numbers} introduced by Chung and Liu. In this paper, we first compute these numbers for stars generalizing the well-known result of Burr and Roberts. Then we extend a result of Cockayne and Lorimer to compute $d$-chromatic Ramsey numbers for stars and one matching.

preprint2012arXiv

Around a conjecture of ErdH{o}s on graph Ramsey numbers

For given graphs G1 and G2 the Ramsey number R(G1,G2), is the smallest positive integer n such that each blue-red edge coloring of the complete graph Kn contains a blue copy of G1 or a red copy of G2. In 1983, Erdos conjectured that there is an absolute constant c such that R(G) = R(G,G) < 2c p m for any graph G with m edges and no isolated vertices. Recently this conjecture was proved by B. Sudakov. In this note, using the Sudakovs ideas we give an extension of his result and some interesting corollaries.

preprint2012arXiv

On three-color Ramsey number of paths

Let $G_1, G_2, ..., G_t$ be graphs. The multicolor Ramsey number $R(G_1, G_2, ..., G_t)$ is the smallest positive integer $n$ such that if the edges of complete graph $K_n$ are partitioned into $t$ disjoint color classes giving $t$ graphs $H_1,H_2,...,H_t$, then at least one $H_i$ has a subgraph isomorphic to $G_i$. In this paper, we prove that if $(n,m)\neq (3,3), (3,4)$ and $m\geq n$, then $R(P_3,P_n,P_m)=R(P_n,P_m)=m+\lfloor \frac{n}{2}\rfloor-1$. Consequently $R(P_3,mK_2,nK_2)=2m+n-1$ for $m\geq n\geq 3$.

preprint2012arXiv

Ramsey numbers of 3-uniform loose paths and loose cycles

Haxell et. al. [%P. Haxell, T. Luczak, Y. Peng, V. Rödl, A. %Ruciński, M. Simonovits, J. Skokan, The Ramsey number for hypergraph cycles I, J. Combin. Theory, Ser. A, 113 (2006), 67-83] proved that the 2-color Ramsey number of 3-uniform loose cycles on $2n$ vertices is asymptotically $\frac{5n}{2}$. Their proof is based on the method of Regularity Lemma. Here, without using this method, we generalize their result by determining the exact values of 2-color Ramsey numbers involving loose paths and cycles in 3-uniform hypergraphs. More precisely, we prove that for every $n\geq m\geq 3$, $R(\mathcal{P}^3_n,\mathcal{P}^3_m)=R(\mathcal{P}^3_n,\mathcal{C}^3_m)=R(\mathcal{C}^3_n,\mathcal{C}^3_m)+1=2n+\lfloor\frac{m+1}{2}\rfloor$ and for $n>m\geq3$, $R(\mathcal{P}^3_m,\mathcal{C}^3_n)=2n+\lfloor\frac{m-1}{2}\rfloor$. These give a positive answer to a question of Gyárfás and Raeisi [The Ramsey number of loose triangles and quadrangles in hypergraphs, Electron. J. Combin. 19 (2012), #R30].

preprint2012arXiv

The Ramsey number of loose paths in 3-uniform hypergraphs

Recently, asymptotic values of 2-color Ramsey numbers for loose cycles and also loose paths were determined. Here we determine the 2-color Ramsey number of 3-uniform loose paths when one of the paths is significantly larger than the other: for every $n\geq \Big\lfloor\frac{5m}{4}\Big\rfloor$, we show that $$R(\mathcal{P}^3_n,\mathcal{P}^3_m)=2n+\Big\lfloor\frac{m+1}{2}\Big\rfloor.$$

preprint2011arXiv

On edge-group choosability of graphs

In this paper, we study the concept of edge-group choosability of graphs. We say that G is edge k-group choosable if its line graph is k-group choosable. An edge-group choosability version of Vizing conjecture is given. The evidence of our claim are graphs with maximum degree less than 4, planar graphs with maximum degree at least 11, planar graphs without small cycles, outerplanar graphs and near-outerplanar graphs.