Source author record

Gholamreza Omidi

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

12works
1topics
4close collaborators

Published work

12 publications

preprint2016arXiv

Decompositions of complete uniform multi-hypergraphs into Berge paths and cycles of arbitrary lengths

In 1981, Alspach conjectured that the complete graph Kn K_{n} could be decomposed into cycles of arbitrary lengths, provided that the obvious necessary conditions would hold. This conjecture was proved completely by Bryant, Horsley and Pettersson in 2014. Moreover, in 1983, Tarsi conjectured that the obvious necessary conditions for packing pairwise edge-disjoint paths of arbitrary lengths in the complete multigraphs were also sufficient. The conjecture was confirmed by Bryant in 2010. In this paper, we investigate an analogous problem as the decomposition of the complete uniform multi-hypergraph μKn(k) μK_{n}^{(k)} into Berge cycles and Berge paths of arbitrary given lengths. We show that for every integer μ≥1 μ\geq 1 , n≥108 n\geq 108 and 3≤k<n 3\leq k<n , μKn(k) μK_{n}^{(k)} can be decomposed into Berge cycles and Berge paths of arbitrary lengths, provided that the obvious necessary conditions hold, thereby generalizing a result by Kühn and Osthus on the decomposition of Kn(k)K_{n}^{(k)} into Hamilton Berge cycles. Furthermore, we obtain the necessary and sufficient conditions for packing the cycles of arbitrary lengths in the complete multigraphs.

preprint2016arXiv

Ramsey numbers of uniform loose paths and cycles

Recently, determining the Ramsey numbers of loose paths and cycles in uniform hypergraphs has received considerable attention. It has been shown that the 22-color Ramsey number of a kk-uniform loose cycle Cnk\mathcal{C}^k_n, R(Cnk,Cnk)R(\mathcal{C}^k_n,\mathcal{C}^k_n), is asymptotically 12(2k−1)n\frac{1}{2}(2k-1)n. Here we conjecture that for any n≥m≥3n\geq m\geq 3 and k≥3,k\geq 3, R(Pnk,Pmk)=R(Pnk,Cmk)=R(Cnk,Cmk)+1=(k−1)n+⌊m+12⌋.R(\mathcal{P}^k_n,\mathcal{P}^k_m)=R(\mathcal{P}^k_n,\mathcal{C}^k_m)=R(\mathcal{C}^k_n,\mathcal{C}^k_m)+1=(k-1)n+\lfloor\frac{m+1}{2}\rfloor. Recently the case k=3k=3 is proved by the authors. In this paper, first we show that this conjecture is true for k=3k=3 with a much shorter proof. Then, we show that for fixed m≥3m\geq 3 and k≥4k\geq 4 the conjecture is equivalent to (only) the last equality for any 2m≥n≥m≥32m\geq n\geq m\geq 3. Consequently, the proof for m=3m=3 follows.

preprint2016arXiv

Size Ramsey numbers of stars versus cliques

The size Ramsey number r^(G,H) \hat{r}(G,H) of two graphs G G and H H is the smallest integer m m such that there exists a graph F F on m m edges with the property that every red-blue colouring of the edges of F F , yields a red copy of G G or a blue copy of H H . In 1981 1981 , Erdős observed that r^(K1,k,K3)≤(2k+12)−(k2)\hat{r}(K_{1,k},K_{3})\leq \binom{2k+1}{2}-\binom{k}{2} and he conjectured that the corresponding upper bound on r^(K1,k,K3) \hat{r}(K_{1,k},K_{3}) is sharp. In 1983 1983 , Faudree and Sheehan extended this conjecture as follows: \hat{r}(K_{1,k},K_{n})=\left \{ {lr} \binom{k(n-1)+1}{2}-\binom{k}{2} & ~k\geq n~ \text{or}~ k~ \text{odd}. \binom{k(n-1)+1}{2}-k(n-1)/2 & \text{otherwise}. \right. They proved the case k=2 k=2 . In 2001 2001 , Pikhurko showed that this conjecture is not true for n=3 n=3 and k≥5 k\geq 5 , disproving the mentioned conjecture of Erdős. Here we prove Faudree and Sheehan's conjecture for a given k≥2 k\geq 2 and n≥k3+2k2+2k n\geq k^{3}+2k^{2}+2k .

preprint2015arXiv

Diagonal Ramsey numbers of loose cycles in uniform hypergraphs

A kk-uniform loose cycle Cnk\mathcal{C}_n^k is a hypergraph with vertex set {v1,v2,…,vn(k−1)}\{v_1,v_2,\ldots,v_{n(k-1)}\} and with the set of nn edges ei={v(i−1)(k−1)+1,v(i−1)(k−1)+2,…,v(i−1)(k−1)+k}e_i=\{v_{(i-1)(k-1)+1},v_{(i-1)(k-1)+2},\ldots,v_{(i-1)(k-1)+k}\}, 1≤i≤n1\leq i\leq n, where we use mod n(k−1)n(k-1) arithmetic. The Ramsey number R(Cnk,Cnk)R(\mathcal{C}^k_n,\mathcal{C}^k_n) is asymptotically 12(2k−1)n\frac{1}{2}(2k-1)n as has been proved by Gyárfás, Sárközy and Szemerédi. In this paper, we investigate to determining the exact value of diagonal Ramsey number of Cnk\mathcal{C}^k_n and we show that for n≥2n\geq 2 and k≥8k\geq 8 R(Cnk,Cnk)=(k−1)n+⌊n−12⌋.R(\mathcal{C}^k_n,\mathcal{C}^k_n)=(k-1)n+\lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor.

preprint2013arXiv

Strongly walk-regular graphs

We study a generalization of strongly regular graphs. We call a graph strongly walk-regular if there is an ℓ>1\ell >1 such that the number of walks of length ℓ\ell from a vertex to another vertex depends only on whether the two vertices are the same, adjacent, or not adjacent. We will show that a strongly walk-regular graph must be an empty graph, a complete graph, a strongly regular graph, a disjoint union of complete bipartite graphs of the same size and isolated vertices, or a regular graph with four eigenvalues. Graphs from the first three families in this list are indeed strongly ℓ\ell-walk-regular for all ℓ\ell, whereas the graphs from the fourth family are ℓ\ell-walk-regular for every odd ℓ\ell. The case of regular graphs with four eigenvalues is the most interesting (and complicated) one. Such graphs cannot be strongly ℓ\ell-walk-regular for even ℓ\ell. We will characterize the case that regular four-eigenvalue graphs are strongly ℓ\ell-walk-regular for every odd ℓ\ell, in terms of the eigenvalues. There are several examples of infinite families of such graphs. We will show that every other regular four-eigenvalue graph can be strongly ℓ\ell-walk-regular for at most one ℓ\ell. There are several examples of infinite families of such graphs that are strongly 3-walk-regular. It however remains open whether there are any graphs that are strongly ℓ\ell-walk-regular for only one particular ℓ\ell different from 3.

preprint2012arXiv

A generalization of Ramsey theory for stars and one matching

A recent question in generalized Ramsey theory is that for fixed positive integers s≤ts\leq t, at least how many vertices can be covered by the vertices of no more than ss monochromatic members of the family F\cal F in every edge coloring of KnK_n with tt colors. This is related to {dd-chromatic Ramsey numbers} introduced by Chung and Liu. In this paper, we first compute these numbers for stars generalizing the well-known result of Burr and Roberts. Then we extend a result of Cockayne and Lorimer to compute dd-chromatic Ramsey numbers for stars and one matching.

preprint2012arXiv

Around a conjecture of ErdH{o}s on graph Ramsey numbers

For given graphs G1 and G2 the Ramsey number R(G1,G2), is the smallest positive integer n such that each blue-red edge coloring of the complete graph Kn contains a blue copy of G1 or a red copy of G2. In 1983, Erdos conjectured that there is an absolute constant c such that R(G) = R(G,G) < 2c p m for any graph G with m edges and no isolated vertices. Recently this conjecture was proved by B. Sudakov. In this note, using the Sudakovs ideas we give an extension of his result and some interesting corollaries.

preprint2012arXiv

On three-color Ramsey number of paths

Let G1,G2,...,GtG_1, G_2, ..., G_t be graphs. The multicolor Ramsey number R(G1,G2,...,Gt)R(G_1, G_2, ..., G_t) is the smallest positive integer nn such that if the edges of complete graph KnK_n are partitioned into tt disjoint color classes giving tt graphs H1,H2,...,HtH_1,H_2,...,H_t, then at least one HiH_i has a subgraph isomorphic to GiG_i. In this paper, we prove that if (n,m)≠(3,3),(3,4)(n,m)\neq (3,3), (3,4) and m≥nm\geq n, then R(P3,Pn,Pm)=R(Pn,Pm)=m+⌊n2⌋−1R(P_3,P_n,P_m)=R(P_n,P_m)=m+\lfloor \frac{n}{2}\rfloor-1. Consequently R(P3,mK2,nK2)=2m+n−1R(P_3,mK_2,nK_2)=2m+n-1 for m≥n≥3m\geq n\geq 3.

preprint2012arXiv

Ramsey numbers of 3-uniform loose paths and loose cycles

Haxell et. al. [%P. Haxell, T. Luczak, Y. Peng, V. Rödl, A. %Ruciński, M. Simonovits, J. Skokan, The Ramsey number for hypergraph cycles I, J. Combin. Theory, Ser. A, 113 (2006), 67-83] proved that the 2-color Ramsey number of 3-uniform loose cycles on 2n2n vertices is asymptotically 5n2\frac{5n}{2}. Their proof is based on the method of Regularity Lemma. Here, without using this method, we generalize their result by determining the exact values of 2-color Ramsey numbers involving loose paths and cycles in 3-uniform hypergraphs. More precisely, we prove that for every n≥m≥3n\geq m\geq 3, R(Pn3,Pm3)=R(Pn3,Cm3)=R(Cn3,Cm3)+1=2n+⌊m+12⌋R(\mathcal{P}^3_n,\mathcal{P}^3_m)=R(\mathcal{P}^3_n,\mathcal{C}^3_m)=R(\mathcal{C}^3_n,\mathcal{C}^3_m)+1=2n+\lfloor\frac{m+1}{2}\rfloor and for n>m≥3n>m\geq3, R(Pm3,Cn3)=2n+⌊m−12⌋R(\mathcal{P}^3_m,\mathcal{C}^3_n)=2n+\lfloor\frac{m-1}{2}\rfloor. These give a positive answer to a question of Gyárfás and Raeisi [The Ramsey number of loose triangles and quadrangles in hypergraphs, Electron. J. Combin. 19 (2012), #R30].

preprint2012arXiv

The Ramsey number of loose paths in 3-uniform hypergraphs

Recently, asymptotic values of 2-color Ramsey numbers for loose cycles and also loose paths were determined. Here we determine the 2-color Ramsey number of 3-uniform loose paths when one of the paths is significantly larger than the other: for every n≥⌊5m4⌋n\geq \Big\lfloor\frac{5m}{4}\Big\rfloor, we show that R(Pn3,Pm3)=2n+⌊m+12⌋.R(\mathcal{P}^3_n,\mathcal{P}^3_m)=2n+\Big\lfloor\frac{m+1}{2}\Big\rfloor.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.