Paper detail

Single-Thread JPEG Decoder Benchmarks Mis-Evaluate ML Data Loaders

JPEG decode is routine ML infrastructure, but Python decoder choices are often justified by single-process, single-thread microbenchmarks. We audit this evaluation assumption with twelve Python-accessible JPEG decode paths on five matched 16 vCPU Google Cloud CPUs: Intel Emerald Rapids, AMD Zen 4, AMD Zen 5, ARM Neoverse V2, and ARM Neoverse N1. ImageNet validation is the workload, not a new dataset contribution: each run decodes the full 50,000-image split from memory and reports single-thread throughput for all decoders, PyTorch DataLoader throughput for eligible decoders at worker counts {0,2,4,8}, and decoder skip behavior. The evaluation protocol changes the supported conclusion. On Neoverse V2, imageio is ninth in single-thread throughput yet lands in the top DataLoader tier with torchvision; on Zen 4, torchvision rises from seventh single-thread to the top measured DataLoader tier; on Neoverse N1, imagecodecs is the single-thread leader but fourth at peak DataLoader throughput. We also find that worker-count conclusions differ between Zen 4 and Zen 5, TensorFlow has a large single-thread ARM penalty, and strict libjpeg-turbo-family wrappers reject the same rare ImageNet JPEG. For PyTorch DataLoader workloads, torchvision and simplejpeg form the strongest measured zero-skip tier: torchvision has the highest mean normalized throughput, while simplejpeg has the highest minimum. OpenCV remains a robust general-purpose fallback above 90% of the platform-local winner on every tested CPU. We release raw JSON, generated tables/figures, and an executable local/cloud benchmark framework.