Paper detail

Simultaneous penalized M-estimation of covariance matrices using geodesically convex optimization

A common assumption when sampling $p$-dimensional observations from $K$ distinct group is the equality of the covariance matrices. In this paper, we propose two penalized $M$-estimation approaches for the estimation of the covariance or scatter matrices under the broader assumption that they may simply be close to each other, and hence roughly deviate from some positive definite "center". The first approach begins by generating a pooled $M$-estimator of scatter based on all the data, followed by a penalised $M$-estimator of scatter for each group, with the penalty term chosen so that the individual scatter matrices are shrunk towards the pooled scatter matrix. In the second approach, we minimize the sum of the individual group $M$-estimation cost functions together with an additive joint penalty term which enforces some similarity between the individual scatter estimators, i.e. shrinkage towards a mutual center. In both approaches, we utilize the concept of geodesic convexity to prove the existence and uniqueness of the penalized solution under general conditions. We consider three specific penalty functions based on the Euclidean, the Riemannian, and the Kullback-Leibler distances. In the second approach, the distance based penalties are shown to lead to estimators of the mutual center that are related to the arithmetic, the Riemannian and the harmonic means of positive definite matrices, respectively. A penalty based on an ellipticity measure is also considered which is particularly useful for shape matrix estimators. Fixed point equations are derived for each penalty function and the benefits of the estimators are illustrated in regularized discriminant analysis problem.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.