Paper detail

Simulation study of the correlation ($X_{max}^μ$, $N^μ$) in view of obtaining information on primary mass of the UHECRs

In this paper we study, using Monte Carlo simulations, the possibility to discriminate the mass of the Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays (UHECRs) by combining information obtained from the maximum $X_{max}^μ$ of the muon production rate longitudinal profile of Extensive Air Showers (EAS) and the number of muons, $N^μ$, which hit an array of detectors located in the horizontal plane. We investigate the sensitivity of the 2D distribution $X_{max}^μ$ versus $N^μ$ to the mass of the primary particle generating the air shower. To this purpose we analyze a set of CORSIKA showers induced by protons and iron nuclei at energies of $10^{19}$eV and $10^{20}$eV, at five angles of incidence, $0^{\circ}$, $37^{\circ}$, $48^{\circ}$, $55^{\circ}$ and $60^{\circ}$. Using the simulations we obtain the 2D Probability Functions $Prob(X_{max}^μ,N^μ \ | \ p)$ and $Prob(X_{max}^μ,N^μ \ | \ Fe)$ which give the probability that a shower induced by a proton or iron nucleus contributes to a specific point on the plane ($X_{max}^μ$, $N^μ$). Then we construct the probability functions $Prob(p\ | \ X_{max}^μ,N^μ)$ and $Prob(Fe \ | \ X_{max}^μ,N^μ)$ which give the probability that a certain point on the plane ($X_{max}^μ$, $N^μ$) corresponds to a shower initiated by a proton or an iron nucleus, respectively. Finally, a test of this procedure using a Bayesian approach, confirms an improved accuracy of the primary mass estimation in comparison with the results obtained using only the $X_{max}^μ$ distributions.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.