Paper detail

Simulation of quantum interference by reactions of chemical type

A quantum unitary evolution alternated with measurements is simulated by a bubble filled with fictitious particles called amplitude quanta that move chaotically and can be transformed by the simple rules that look like chemical reactions. A basic state of simulated system is treated as a collision of the two corresponding amplitude quanta, that gives the quantum statistics of measurements. The movement of the external membrane of the bubble corresponds to the classical dynamics of the simulated system. Measurements are treated as the membrane perforations and they are completely determined by initial conditions. An identity of particles and an entanglement is simulated by the membranes touching. The required memory grows linearly where the number of particles increases, but entangled states of the big number of particles can be simulated. The method can be used for a visualization of quantum dynamics.

preprint2003arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.