Paper detail

Simulating Liquids with Graph Networks

Simulating complex dynamics like fluids with traditional simulators is computationally challenging. Deep learning models have been proposed as an efficient alternative, extending or replacing parts of traditional simulators. We investigate graph neural networks (GNNs) for learning fluid dynamics and find that their generalization capability is more limited than previous works would suggest. We also challenge the current practice of adding random noise to the network inputs in order to improve its generalization capability and simulation stability. We find that inserting the real data distribution, e.g. by unrolling multiple simulation steps, improves accuracy and that hiding all domain-specific features from the learning model improves generalization. Our results indicate that learning models, such as GNNs, fail to learn the exact underlying dynamics unless the training set is devoid of any other problem-specific correlations that could be used as shortcuts.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.