Simple non-Abelian extensions of the standard model gauge group and the diboson excesses at the LHC

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Abstract

The ATLAS collaboration reported excesses at around 2 TeV in the di-boson production decaying into hadronic final states. We consider the possibility of explaining the excesses with extra gauge bosons in two simple non-Abelian extensions of the Standard Model. One is the so-called G(221)G(221) models with a symmetry structure of SU(2)1⊗SU(2)2⊗U(1)XSU(2)_1\otimes SU(2)_2\otimes U(1)_X and the other is the G(331)G(331) models with an extended symmetry of SU(3)C⊗SU(3)L⊗U(1)XSU(3)_C\otimes SU(3)_L\otimes U(1)_X. The W′W' and Z′Z' bosons emerge after the electroweak symmetry is spontaneously broken. Two patterns of symmetry breaking in the G(221)G(221) models are considered in this work: one is SU(2)L⊗SU(2)2⊗U(1)X→SU(2)L⊗U(1)YSU(2)_L\otimes SU(2)_2 \otimes U(1)_X \to SU(2)_L\otimes U(1)_Y, the other is SU(2)1⊗SU(2)2⊗U(1)Y→SU(2)L⊗U(1)YSU(2)_1\otimes SU(2)_2 \otimes U(1)_Y \to SU(2)_L\otimes U(1)_Y. The symmetry breaking of the G(331)G(331) model is SU(3)L⊗U(1)X→SU(2)L⊗U(1)YSU(3)_L\otimes U(1)_X \to SU(2)_L \otimes U(1)_Y. We perform a global analysis of W′W^\prime and Z′Z^\prime phenomenology in ten new physics models, including all the channels of W′/Z′W^\prime/Z^\prime decay. Our study shows that the leptonic mode and the dijet mode of W′/Z′W^\prime/Z^\prime decays impose a very stringent bound on the parameter space in several new physics models. Such tight bounds provide a useful guide for building new physics models to address on the diboson anomalies. We also note that the Left-Right and Lepton-Phobic models can explain the 3.4σ3.4σ WZWZ excess if the 2.6σ2.6σ deviation in the W+W−W^+W^- pair around 2~TeV were confirmed to be a fluctuation of the SM backgrounds.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.