Paper detail

Simple Modulo can Significantly Outperform Deep Learning-based Deepcode

Deepcode (H.Kim et al.2018) is a recently suggested Deep Learning-based scheme for communication over the AWGN channel with noisy feedback, claimed to be superior to all previous schemes in the literature. Deepcode's use of nonlinear coding (via Deep Learning) has been inspired by known shortcomings (Y.-H. Kim et al 2007) of linear feedback schemes. In 2014, we presented a nonlinear feedback coding scheme based on a combination of the classical SK scheme and modulo-arithmetic, using a small number of elementary operations without any type of neural network. This Modulo-SK scheme has been omitted from the performance comparisons made in the Deepcode paper, due to its use of common randomness (dither), and in a later version since it was incorrectly interpreted as a variable-length coding scheme. However, the dither in Modulo-SK was used only for the standard purpose of tractable performance analysis, and is not required in practice. In this short note, we show that a fully-deterministic Modulo-SK (without dithering) can outperform Deepcode. For example, to attain an error probability of 10^(-4) at rate 1/3 Modulo-SK requires 3dB less feedback SNR than Deepcode. To attain an error probability of 10^(-6) with noiseless feedback, Deepcode requires 150 rounds of communication, whereas Modulo-SK requires only 15 rounds, even if the feedback is noisy (with 27dB SNR). We further address the numerical stability issues of the original SK scheme reported in the Deepcode paper, and explain how they can be avoided. We augment this report with an online-available, fully-functional Matlab simulation for both the classical and Modulo-SK schemes. Finally, note that Modulo-SK is by no means claimed to be the best possible solution; in particular, using deep learning in conjunction with modulo-arithmetic might lead to better designs, and remains a fascinating direction for future research.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.