Paper detail

Simple Majority Consensus in Networks with Unreliable Communication

In this work, we analyze the performance of a simple majority-rule protocol solving a fundamental coordination problem in distributed systems - \emph{binary majority consensus}, in the presence of probabilistic message loss. Using probabilistic analysis for a large scale, fully-connected, network of $2n$ agents, we prove that the Simple Majority Protocol (SMP) reaches consensus in only three communication rounds with probability approaching $1$ as $n$ grows to infinity. Moreover, if the difference between the numbers of agents that hold different opinions grows at a rate of $\sqrt{n}$, then the SMP with only two communication rounds attains consensus on the majority opinion of the network, and if this difference grows faster than $\sqrt{n}$, then the SMP reaches consensus on the majority opinion of the network in a single round, with probability converging to $1$ exponentially fast as $n \rightarrow \infty$. We also provide some converse results, showing that these requirements are not only sufficient, but also necessary.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.