Paper detail

Simple heteroclinic cycles in R^4

In generic dynamical systems heteroclinic cycles are invariant sets of codimension at least one, but they can be structurally stable in systems which are equivariant under the action of a symmetry group, due to the existence of flow-invariant subspaces. For dynamical systems in R^n the minimal dimension for which such robust heteroclinic cycles can exist is n=3. In this case the list of admissible symmetry groups is short and well-known. The situation is different and more interesting when n=4. In this paper we list all finite groups Gamma such that an open set of smooth Gamma-equivariant dynamical systems in R^4 possess a very simple heteroclinic cycle (a structurally stable heteroclinic cycle satisfying certain additional constraints). This work extends the results which were obtained by Sottocornola in the case when all equilibria in the heteroclinic cycle belong to the same Gamma-orbit (in this case one speaks of homoclinic cycles).

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.