Paper detail

Simple Error Bounds for Regularized Noisy Linear Inverse Problems

Consider estimating a structured signal $\mathbf{x}_0$ from linear, underdetermined and noisy measurements $\mathbf{y}=\mathbf{A}\mathbf{x}_0+\mathbf{z}$, via solving a variant of the lasso algorithm: $\hat{\mathbf{x}}=\arg\min_\mathbf{x}\{ \|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{A}\mathbf{x}\|_2+λf(\mathbf{x})\}$. Here, $f$ is a convex function aiming to promote the structure of $\mathbf{x}_0$, say $\ell_1$-norm to promote sparsity or nuclear norm to promote low-rankness. We assume that the entries of $\mathbf{A}$ are independent and normally distributed and make no assumptions on the noise vector $\mathbf{z}$, other than it being independent of $\mathbf{A}$. Under this generic setup, we derive a general, non-asymptotic and rather tight upper bound on the $\ell_2$-norm of the estimation error $\|\hat{\mathbf{x}}-\mathbf{x}_0\|_2$. Our bound is geometric in nature and obeys a simple formula; the roles of $λ$, $f$ and $\mathbf{x}_0$ are all captured by a single summary parameter $δ(λ\partial((f(\mathbf{x}_0)))$, termed the Gaussian squared distance to the scaled subdifferential. We connect our result to the literature and verify its validity through simulations.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors5 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.