Paper detail

Simple cubic random-site percolation thresholds for neighborhoods containing fourth-nearest neighbors

In the paper random-site percolation thresholds for simple cubic lattice with sites' neighborhoods containing next-next-next-nearest neighbors (4NN) are evaluated with Monte Carlo simulations. A recently proposed algorithm with low sampling for percolation thresholds estimation [Bastas et al., arXiv:1411.5834] is implemented for the studies of the top-bottom wrapping probability. The obtained percolation thresholds are $p_C(\text{4NN})=0.31160(12)$, $p_C(\text{4NN+NN})=0.15040(12)$, $p_C(\text{4NN+2NN})=0.15950(12)$, $p_C(\text{4NN+3NN})=0.20490(12)$, $p_C(\text{4NN+2NN+NN})=0.11440(12)$, $p_C(\text{4NN+3NN+NN})=0.11920(12)$, $p_C(\text{4NN+3NN+2NN})=0.11330(12)$, $p_C(\text{4NN+3NN+2NN+NN})=0.10000(12)$, where 3NN, 2NN, NN stands for next-next-nearest neighbors, next-nearest neighbors, and nearest neighbors, respectively. As an SC lattice with 4NN neighbors may be mapped onto two independent interpenetrated SC lattices but with two times larger lattice constant the percolation threshold $p_C$(4NN) is exactly equal to $p_C$(NN). The simplified Bastas et al. method allows for reaching uncertainty of the percolation threshold value $p_C$ similar to those obtained with classical method but ten times faster.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.