Paper detail

Simple cubic random-site percolation thresholds for complex neighbourhoods

In this communication with computer simulation we evaluate simple cubic random-site percolation thresholds for neighbourhoods including the nearest neighbours (NN), the next-nearest neighbours (2NN) and the next-next-nearest neighbours (3NN). Our estimations base on finite-size scaling analysis of the percolation probability vs. site occupation probability plots. The Hoshen--Kopelman algorithm has been applied for cluster labelling. The calculated thresholds are 0.1372(1), 0.1420(1), 0.0976(1), 0.1991(1), 0.1036(1), 0.2455(1) for (NN + 2NN), (NN + 3NN), (NN + 2NN + 3NN), 2NN, (2NN + 3NN), 3NN neighbourhoods, respectively. In contrast to the results obtained for a square lattice the calculated percolation thresholds decrease monotonically with the site coordination number z, at least for our inspected neighbourhoods.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.