Paper detail

SiMCa: Sinkhorn Matrix Factorization with Capacity Constraints

For a very broad range of problems, recommendation algorithms have been increasingly used over the past decade. In most of these algorithms, the predictions are built upon user-item affinity scores which are obtained from high-dimensional embeddings of items and users. In more complex scenarios, with geometrical or capacity constraints, prediction based on embeddings may not be sufficient and some additional features should be considered in the design of the algorithm. In this work, we study the recommendation problem in the setting where affinities between users and items are based both on their embeddings in a latent space and on their geographical distance in their underlying euclidean space (e.g., $\mathbb{R}^2$), together with item capacity constraints. This framework is motivated by some real-world applications, for instance in healthcare: the task is to recommend hospitals to patients based on their location, pathology, and hospital capacities. In these applications, there is somewhat of an asymmetry between users and items: items are viewed as static points, their embeddings, capacities and locations constraining the allocation. Upon the observation of an optimal allocation, user embeddings, items capacities, and their positions in their underlying euclidean space, our aim is to recover item embeddings in the latent space; doing so, we are then able to use this estimate e.g. in order to predict future allocations. We propose an algorithm (SiMCa) based on matrix factorization enhanced with optimal transport steps to model user-item affinities and learn item embeddings from observed data. We then illustrate and discuss the results of such an approach for hospital recommendation on synthetic data.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.