Paper detail

SIM2E: Benchmarking the Group Equivariant Capability of Correspondence Matching Algorithms

Correspondence matching is a fundamental problem in computer vision and robotics applications. Solving correspondence matching problems using neural networks has been on the rise recently. Rotation-equivariance and scale-equivariance are both critical in correspondence matching applications. Classical correspondence matching approaches are designed to withstand scaling and rotation transformations. However, the features extracted using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are only translation-equivariant to a certain extent. Recently, researchers have strived to improve the rotation-equivariance of CNNs based on group theories. Sim(2) is the group of similarity transformations in the 2D plane. This paper presents a specialized dataset dedicated to evaluating sim(2)-equivariant correspondence matching algorithms. We compare the performance of 16 state-of-the-art (SoTA) correspondence matching approaches. The experimental results demonstrate the importance of group equivariant algorithms for correspondence matching on various sim(2) transformation conditions. Since the subpixel accuracy achieved by CNN-based correspondence matching approaches is unsatisfactory, this specific area requires more attention in future works. Our dataset is publicly available at: mias.group/SIM2E.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.