Paper detail

SILVAN: Estimating Betweenness Centralities with Progressive Sampling and Non-uniform Rademacher Bounds

Betweenness centrality is a popular centrality measure with applications in several domains, and whose exact computation is impractical for modern-sized networks. We present SILVAN, a novel, efficient algorithm to compute, with high probability, accurate estimates of the betweenness centrality of all nodes of a graph and a high-quality approximation of the top-k betweenness centralities. SILVAN follows a progressive sampling approach, and builds on novel bounds based on Monte-Carlo Empirical Rademacher Averages, a powerful and flexible tool from statistical learning theory. SILVAN relies on a novel estimation scheme providing non-uniform bounds on the deviation of the estimates of the betweenness centrality of all the nodes from their true values, and a refined characterisation of the number of samples required to obtain a high-quality approximation. Our extensive experimental evaluation shows that SILVAN extracts high-quality approximations while outperforming, in terms of number of samples and accuracy, the state-of-the-art approximation algorithm with comparable quality guarantees.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.