Paper detail

SILCC-Zoom: H$_2$ and CO-dark gas in molecular clouds -- The impact of feedback and magnetic fields

We analyse the CO-dark molecular gas content of simulated molecular clouds from the SILCC-Zoom project. The simulations reach a resolution of 0.1 pc and include H$_2$ and CO formation, radiative stellar feedback and magnetic fields. CO-dark gas is found in regions with local visual extinctions $A_\text{V, 3D} \sim$ 0.2 - 1.5, number densities of 10 - 10$^{3}$ cm$^{-3}$ and gas temperatures of few 10 K - 100 K. CO-bright gas is found at number densities above 300 cm$^{-3}$ and temperatures below 50 K. The CO-dark gas fractions range from 40% to 95% and scale inversely with the amount of well-shielded gas ($A_\text{V, 3D}$ $\gtrsim$ 1.5), which is smaller in magnetised molecular clouds. We show that the density, chemical abundances and $A_\text{V, 3D}$ along a given line-of-sight cannot be properly determined from projected quantities. As an example, pixels with a projected visual extinction of $A_\text{V, 2D} \simeq$ 2.5 - 5 can be both, CO-bright or CO-dark, which can be attributed to the presence or absence of strong density enhancements along the line-of-sight. By producing synthetic CO(1-0) emission maps of the simulations with RADMC-3D, we show that about 15 - 65\% of the H$_2$ is in regions with intensities below the detection limit. Our clouds have $X_\text{CO}$-factors around 1.5 $\times$ 10$^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$ (K km s$^{-1}$)$^{-1}$ with a spread of up to a factor $\sim$ 4, implying a similar uncertainty in the derived total H$_2$ masses and even worse for individual pixels. Based on our results, we suggest a new approach to determine the H$_2$ mass, which relies on the availability of CO(1-0) emission and $A_\text{V, 2D}$ maps. It reduces the uncertainty of the clouds' overall H$_2$ mass to a factor of $\lesssim$ 1.8 and for individual pixels, i.e. on sub-pc scales, to a factor of $\lesssim$ 3.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.