Source author record

E. M. A. Borchert

E. M. A. Borchert appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2019arXiv

SILCC-Zoom: H$_2$ and CO-dark gas in molecular clouds -- The impact of feedback and magnetic fields

We analyse the CO-dark molecular gas content of simulated molecular clouds from the SILCC-Zoom project. The simulations reach a resolution of 0.1 pc and include H$_2$ and CO formation, radiative stellar feedback and magnetic fields. CO-dark gas is found in regions with local visual extinctions $A_\text{V, 3D} \sim$ 0.2 - 1.5, number densities of 10 - 10$^{3}$ cm$^{-3}$ and gas temperatures of few 10 K - 100 K. CO-bright gas is found at number densities above 300 cm$^{-3}$ and temperatures below 50 K. The CO-dark gas fractions range from 40% to 95% and scale inversely with the amount of well-shielded gas ($A_\text{V, 3D}$ $\gtrsim$ 1.5), which is smaller in magnetised molecular clouds. We show that the density, chemical abundances and $A_\text{V, 3D}$ along a given line-of-sight cannot be properly determined from projected quantities. As an example, pixels with a projected visual extinction of $A_\text{V, 2D} \simeq$ 2.5 - 5 can be both, CO-bright or CO-dark, which can be attributed to the presence or absence of strong density enhancements along the line-of-sight. By producing synthetic CO(1-0) emission maps of the simulations with RADMC-3D, we show that about 15 - 65\% of the H$_2$ is in regions with intensities below the detection limit. Our clouds have $X_\text{CO}$-factors around 1.5 $\times$ 10$^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$ (K km s$^{-1}$)$^{-1}$ with a spread of up to a factor $\sim$ 4, implying a similar uncertainty in the derived total H$_2$ masses and even worse for individual pixels. Based on our results, we suggest a new approach to determine the H$_2$ mass, which relies on the availability of CO(1-0) emission and $A_\text{V, 2D}$ maps. It reduces the uncertainty of the clouds' overall H$_2$ mass to a factor of $\lesssim$ 1.8 and for individual pixels, i.e. on sub-pc scales, to a factor of $\lesssim$ 3.