Paper detail

Signs of Higher Multipoles and Orbital Precession in GW151226

We present a reanalysis of GW151226, the second binary black hole merger discovered by the LIGO--Virgo Collaboration. Previous analysis showed that the best-fit waveform for this event corresponded to the merger of a $\sim 14 \, M_\odot$ black hole with a $\sim 7.5 \, M_\odot$ companion, and the posterior distribution in mass ratio ($q \leq 1$) is rather flat. In this work, we perform parameter estimation using a waveform model that includes the effects of orbital precession and higher-order radiative multipole modes, and we find that the source parameters of GW151226 shift towards the low $q$ and high effective spin ($χ_{\rm eff}$) region and that $q$ is better measured. The new solution has a log likelihood roughly two points higher than when either higher multipoles or orbital precession is neglected and can alter the astrophysical interpretation of GW151226. Additionally, we find it useful to use a flat-in-$χ{\rm eff}$ prior, which does not penalize the large $|χ_{\rm eff}|$ region, in order to uncover the higher likelihood region for GW151226. Our solution has several interesting properties: (a) the secondary black hole mass is close to the upper limit of the hypothesized lower mass gap of astrophysical black hole population; and (b) orbital precession is driven by the primary black hole spin, which has a dimensionless magnitude as large as $\sim 0.85$ and is tilted away from the orbital angular momentum at an angle of $\sim 57^\circ$. Since GW151226 is a relatively weak signal, an unambiguous claim of the detection of these effects in the signal cannot be made.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.