Paper detail

Signature of bi-modal fission in Uranium nuclei

We report here the signature of bi-modal fission, one asymmetric and the other symmetric, in Uranium nuclei in the mass range A = 230 to 236. The finding is unexpected and striking and is based on a model independent analysis of experimental mass distributions (cumulative yields) at various excitations from about 23 to 66 MeV in the alpha induced fission of 232Th. It has been found that the observed asymmetry in the mass distributions and the unusually narrow peak in the symmetry region, can both be explained in a consistent manner if one assumes: a) multi-chance fission, b) bi-modal fission at lower excitations (9 < E* < 25 MeV) for all the Uranium nuclei in the range A = 230 to 236, and c) that the shell effects get washed out completely beyond about 25 MeV of excitation resulting in symmetric fission. The analysis has allowed a quantitative estimation of the percentages of the asymmetric and the symmetric component in the bi-modal fission. It has been found that the bi-modal fission in Uranium nuclei is predominantly asymmetric (~ 85%), which contributes in a major way to the observed asymmetric peaks, while the ~15% bi-modal symmetric fission is primarily responsible for the observed narrow symmetric peak in the mass distributions. The unusually narrow symmetry peak in the mass distributions indicates that the symmetric bi-modal fission in Uranium nuclei must have proceeded from a configuration at the bi-modal symmetric saddle that is highly deformed with a well-developed neck.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.