Paper detail

Signal Confidence Limits from a Neural Network Data Analysis

This paper deals with a situation of some importance for the analysis of experimental data via Neural Network (NN) or similar devices: Let $N$ data be given, such that $N=N_s+N_b$, where $N_s$ is the number of signals, $N_b$ the number of background events, both unknown. Assume that a NN has been trained, such that it will tag signals with efficiency $F_s$, $(0<F_s<1)$ and background data with $F_b$, $(0<F_b<1)$. Applying the NN yields $N^Y$ tagged events. We demonstrate that the knowledge of $N^Y$ is sufficient to calculate confidence bounds for the signal likelihood, which have the same statistical interpretation as the Clopper-Pearson bounds for the well-studied case of direct signal observation. Subsequently, we discuss rigorous bounds for the a-posteriori distribution function of the signal probability, as well as for the (closely related) likelihood that there are $N_s$ signals in the data. We compare them with results obtained by starting off with a maximum entropy type assumption for the a-priori likelihood that there are $N_s$ signals in the data and applying the Bayesian theorem. Difficulties are encountered with the latter method.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.