Source author record

B. Berg

B. Berg appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

hep-ex hep-ph quant-ph

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works

3topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2009arXiv

Efimov states in atom-molecular collisions

We analyse scattering of a heavy atom off a weakly bound molecule comprising an identical heavy and a light atom in the Born-Oppenheimer approximation. We focus on the situation where the heavy atoms are bosons, which was realized in several experiments. The elastic and inelastic cross sections for the atom-molecular scattering exhibit a series of resonances corresponding to three-body Efimov states. Resonances in elastic collisions are accessible experimentally through thermalization rates, and thus constitute an alternative way of observing Efimov states.

preprint1997arXiv

Signal Confidence Limits from a Neural Network Data Analysis

This paper deals with a situation of some importance for the analysis of experimental data via Neural Network (NN) or similar devices: Let $N$ data be given, such that $N=N_s+N_b$, where $N_s$ is the number of signals, $N_b$ the number of background events, both unknown. Assume that a NN has been trained, such that it will tag signals with efficiency $F_s$, $(0<F_s<1)$ and background data with $F_b$, $(0<F_b<1)$. Applying the NN yields $N^Y$ tagged events. We demonstrate that the knowledge of $N^Y$ is sufficient to calculate confidence bounds for the signal likelihood, which have the same statistical interpretation as the Clopper-Pearson bounds for the well-studied case of direct signal observation. Subsequently, we discuss rigorous bounds for the a-posteriori distribution function of the signal probability, as well as for the (closely related) likelihood that there are $N_s$ signals in the data. We compare them with results obtained by starting off with a maximum entropy type assumption for the a-priori likelihood that there are $N_s$ signals in the data and applying the Bayesian theorem. Difficulties are encountered with the latter method.