Paper detail

Sign Stable Projections, Sign Cauchy Projections and Chi-Square Kernels

The method of stable random projections is popular for efficiently computing the Lp distances in high dimension (where 0<p<=2), using small space. Because it adopts nonadaptive linear projections, this method is naturally suitable when the data are collected in a dynamic streaming fashion (i.e., turnstile data streams). In this paper, we propose to use only the signs of the projected data and analyze the probability of collision (i.e., when the two signs differ). We derive a bound of the collision probability which is exact when p=2 and becomes less sharp when p moves away from 2. Interestingly, when p=1 (i.e., Cauchy random projections), we show that the probability of collision can be accurately approximated as functions of the chi-square similarity. For example, when the (un-normalized) data are binary, the maximum approximation error of the collision probability is smaller than 0.0192. In text and vision applications, the chi-square similarity is a popular measure for nonnegative data when the features are generated from histograms. Our experiments confirm that the proposed method is promising for large-scale learning applications.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.