Paper detail

SIGMA: A Structural Inconsistency Reducing Graph Matching Algorithm

Graph matching finds the correspondence of nodes across two correlated graphs and lies at the core of many applications. When graph side information is not available, the node correspondence is estimated on the sole basis of network topologies. In this paper, we propose a novel criterion to measure the graph matching accuracy, structural inconsistency (SI), which is defined based on the network topological structure. Specifically, SI incorporates the heat diffusion wavelet to accommodate the multi-hop structure of the graphs. Based on SI, we propose a Structural Inconsistency reducing Graph Matching Algorithm (SIGMA), which improves the alignment scores of node pairs that have low SI values in each iteration. Under suitable assumptions, SIGMA can reduce SI values of true counterparts. Furthermore, we demonstrate that SIGMA can be derived by using a mirror descent method to solve the Gromov-Wasserstein distance with a novel K-hop-structure-based matching costs. Extensive experiments show that our method outperforms state-of-the-art methods.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.