Paper detail

Shuffle polygraphic resolutions for operads

Shuffle operads were introduced to forget the symmetric group actions on symmetric operads while preserving all possible operadic compositions. Rewriting methods were then applied to symmetric operads via shuffle operads: in particular, a notion of Gröbner basis was introduced for shuffle operads with respect to a total order on tree monomials. In this article, we introduce the structure of shuffle polygraphs as a categorical model for rewriting in shuffle operads, which generalizes the Gröbner bases approach by removing the constraint of a monomial order for the orientation of the rewriting rules. We define w-operads as internal w-categories in the category of shuffle operads. We show how to extend a convergent shuffle polygraph into a shuffle polygraphic resolution generated by the overlapping branchings of the original polygraph. Finally, we prove that a shuffle operad presented by a quadratic convergent shuffle polygraph is Koszul.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.