Paper detail

Shortest Path Centrality and the APSP problem via VC-dimension and Rademacher Averages

In this paper we are interested in a version of the All-pairs Shortest Paths problem (APSP) that fits neither in the exact nor in the approximate case. We define a measure of centrality of a shortest path, related to the ``importance&#39;&#39; of such shortest path in the graph, and propose an algorithm based on the idea of progressive sampling that, for {\it any fixed constants} $0 < ε$, $ δ< 1$, given an undirected graph $G$ with non-negative edge weights, outputs with probability $1 - δ$ a data structure of size $n \cdot \textrm{Diam}_V(G)$, where $\textrm{Diam}_V(G)$ is the vertex diameter of $G$, in expected time $\mathcal{O}(\lg n \max(m + n \log n, n \cdot \textrm{Diam}_V(G)))$ containing the (exact) distance and the shortest path between every pair of vertices $(u,v)$ that has centrality at least $ε$. The progressive sampling technique is sensitive to the probability distribution of the input (if we assume that $G$ is chosen from a prescribed random distribution), but even in the case where we take no assumption about such distribution, we show an upper bound for the sample size using VC-dimension theory that is tighter than the bound given by standard Hoeffding and union bounds, since VC-dimension theory captures the combinatorial structure of the input graph.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.