BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Murilo V. G. da Silva

Murilo V. G. da Silva contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and Algorithms

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Estimating the Percolation Centrality of Large Networks through Pseudo-dimension Theory

In this work we investigate the problem of estimating the percolation centrality of every vertex in a graph. This centrality measure quantifies the importance of each vertex in a graph going through a contagious process. It is an open problem whether the percolation centrality can be computed in $\mathcal{O}(n^{3-c})$ time, for any constant $c>0$. In this paper we present a $\mathcal{O}(m \log^2 n)$ randomized approximation algorithm for the percolation centrality for every vertex of $G$, generalizing techniques developed by Riondato, Upfal e Kornaropoulos (this complexity is reduced to $\mathcal{O}((m+n) \log n)$ for unweighted graphs). The estimation obtained by the algorithm is within $ε$ of the exact value with probability $1-δ$, for {\it fixed} constants $0 < ε,δ\leq 1$. In fact, we show in our experimental analysis that in the case of real world complex networks, the output produced by our algorithm is significantly closer to the exact values than its guarantee in terms of theoretical worst case analysis.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

FPT and kernelization algorithms for the k-in-a-tree problem

The three-in-a-tree problem asks for an induced tree of the input graph containing three mandatory vertices. In 2006, Chudnovsky and Seymour [Combinatorica, 2010] presented the first polynomial time algorithm for this problem, which has become a critical subroutine in many algorithms for detecting induced subgraphs, such as beetles, pyramids, thetas, and even and odd-holes. In 2007, Derhy and Picouleau [Discrete Applied Mathematics, 2009] considered the natural generalization to $k$ mandatory vertices, proving that, when $k$ is part of the input, the problem is $\mathsf{NP}$-complete, and ask what is the complexity of four-in-a-tree. Motivated by this question and the relevance of the original problem, we study the parameterized complexity of $k$-in-a-tree. We begin by showing that the problem is $\mathsf{W[1]}$-hard when jointly parameterized by the size of the solution and minimum clique cover and, under the Exponential Time Hypothesis, does not admit an $n^{o(k)}$ time algorithm. Afterwards, we use Courcelle&#39;s Theorem to prove fixed-parameter tractability under cliquewidth, which prompts our investigation into which parameterizations admit single exponential algorithms; we show that such algorithms exist for the unrelated parameterizations treewidth, distance to cluster, and distance to co-cluster. In terms of kernelization, we present a linear kernel under feedback edge set, and show that no polynomial kernel exists under vertex cover nor distance to clique unless $\mathsf{NP} \subseteq \mathsf{coNP}/\mathsf{poly}$. Along with other remarks and previous work, our tractability and kernelization results cover many of the most commonly employed parameters in the graph parameter hierarchy.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Shortest Path Centrality and the APSP problem via VC-dimension and Rademacher Averages

In this paper we are interested in a version of the All-pairs Shortest Paths problem (APSP) that fits neither in the exact nor in the approximate case. We define a measure of centrality of a shortest path, related to the ``importance&#39;&#39; of such shortest path in the graph, and propose an algorithm based on the idea of progressive sampling that, for {\it any fixed constants} $0 < ε$, $ δ< 1$, given an undirected graph $G$ with non-negative edge weights, outputs with probability $1 - δ$ a data structure of size $n \cdot \textrm{Diam}_V(G)$, where $\textrm{Diam}_V(G)$ is the vertex diameter of $G$, in expected time $\mathcal{O}(\lg n \max(m + n \log n, n \cdot \textrm{Diam}_V(G)))$ containing the (exact) distance and the shortest path between every pair of vertices $(u,v)$ that has centrality at least $ε$. The progressive sampling technique is sensitive to the probability distribution of the input (if we assume that $G$ is chosen from a prescribed random distribution), but even in the case where we take no assumption about such distribution, we show an upper bound for the sample size using VC-dimension theory that is tighter than the bound given by standard Hoeffding and union bounds, since VC-dimension theory captures the combinatorial structure of the input graph.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access