Paper detail

Short-range correlations in percolation at criticality

We derive the critical nearest-neighbor connectivity $g_n$ as $3/4$, $3(7-9p_c^{tri})/[4(5-4p_c^{tri})]$, and $3(2+7p_c^{tri})/[4(5-p_c^{tri})]$ for bond percolation on the square, honeycomb and triangular lattice respectively, where $p_c^{tri}=2\sin(π/18)$ is the percolation threshold for the triangular lattice; and confirm these values via Monte Carlo simulations. On the square lattice, we also numerically determine the critical next-nearest-neighbor connectivity as $g_{nn}=0.687\;500\;0(2)$, which confirms a conjecture by Mitra and Nienhuis in J. Stat. Mech. P10006 (2004), implying the exact value $g_{nn}=11/16$. We also determine the connectivity on a free surface as $g_n^{surf}=0.625\;000\;1(13)$ and conjecture that this value is exactly equal to $5/8$. In addition, we find that at criticality, the connectivities depend on the linear finite size L as $\sim L^{y_t-d}$, and the associated specific-heat-like quantities $C_n$ and $C_{nn}$ scale as $\sim L^{2y_t-d} \ln (L/L_0)$, where $d$ is the lattice dimensionality, $y_t=1/ν$ the thermal renormalization exponent, and $L_0$ a non-universal constant. We provide an explanation of this logarithmic factor in the theoretical framework reported recently by Vasseur et al. in J. Stat. Mech. L07001 (2012).

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.