Paper detail

Sharper convergence bounds of Monte Carlo Rademacher Averages through Self-Bounding functions

We derive sharper probabilistic concentration bounds for the Monte Carlo Empirical Rademacher Averages (MCERA), which are proved through recent results on the concentration of self-bounding functions. Our novel bounds are characterized by convergence rates that depend on data-dependent characteristic quantities of the set of functions under consideration, such as the empirical wimpy variance, an essential improvement w.r.t. standard bounds based on the methods of bounded differences. For this reason, our new results are applicable to yield sharper bounds to (Local) Rademacher Averages. We also derive improved novel variance-dependent bounds for the special case where only one vector of Rademacher random variables is used to compute the MCERA, through the application of Bousquet's inequality and novel data-dependent bounds to the wimpy variance. Then, we leverage the framework of self-bounding functions to derive novel probabilistic bounds to the supremum deviations, that may be of independent interest.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.