Paper detail

Sharpening the triangle inequality: envelopes between $L^{2}$ and $L^{p}$ spaces

Motivated by the inequality $\|f+g\|_{2}^{2} \leq \|f\|_{2}^{2}+2\|fg\|_{1}+\|g\|^{2}_{2}$, Carbery (2006) raised the question what is the "right" analogue of this estimate in $L^{p}$ for $p \neq 2$. Carlen, Frank, Ivanisvili and Lieb (2018) recently obtained an $L^{p}$ version of this inequality by providing upper bounds for $\|f+g\|_{p}^{p}$ in terms of the quantities $\|f\|_{p}^{p}, \|g\|_{p}^{p}$ and $\|fg\|_{p/2}^{p/2}$ when $p \in(0,1] \cup [2,\infty)$, and lower bounds when $p \in (-\infty,0) \cup (1,2)$, thereby proving (and improving) the suggested possible inequalities of Carbery. We continue investigation in this direction by refining the estimates of Carlen, Frank, Ivanisvili and Lieb. We obtain upper bounds for $\|f + g\|_p^p$ also when $p \in (-\infty,0) \cup (1,2)$ and lower bounds when $p \in (0,1] \cup [2,\infty)$. For $p \in [1,2]$ we extend our upper bounds to any finite number of functions. In addition, we show that all our upper and lower bounds of $\|f+g\|_{p}^{p}$ for $p \in \mathbb{R}$, $p\neq 0$, are the best possible in terms of the quantities $\|f\|_{p}^{p}, \|g\|_{p}^{p}$ and $\|fg\|_{p/2}^{p/2}$, and we characterize the equality cases.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.