Paper detail

Sharp minimax tests for large Toeplitz covariance matrices with repeated observations

We observe a sample of $n$ independent $p$-dimensional Gaussian vectors with Toeplitz covariance matrix $ Σ= [σ_{|i-j|}]_{1 \leq i,j \leq p}$ and $σ_0=1$. We consider the problem of testing the hypothesis that $Σ$ is the identity matrix asymptotically when $n \to \infty$ and $p \to \infty$. We suppose that the covariances $σ_k$ decrease either polynomially ($\sum_{k \geq 1} k^{2α} σ^2_{k} \leq L$ for $ α>1/4$ and $L>0$) or exponentially ($\sum_{k \geq 1} e^{2Ak} σ^2_{k} \leq L$ for $ A,L>0$). We consider a test procedure based on a weighted U-statistic of order 2, with optimal weights chosen as solution of an extremal problem. We give the asymptotic normality of the test statistic under the null hypothesis for fixed $n$ and $p \to + \infty$ and the asymptotic behavior of the type I error probability of our test procedure. We also show that the maximal type II error probability, either tend to $0$, or is bounded from above. In the latter case, the upper bound is given using the asymptotic normality of our test statistic under alternatives close to the separation boundary. Our assumptions imply mild conditions: $n=o(p^{2α- 1/2})$ (in the polynomial case), $n=o(e^p)$ (in the exponential case). We prove both rate optimality and sharp optimality of our results, for $α>1$ in the polynomial case and for any $A>0$ in the exponential case. A simulation study illustrates the good behavior of our procedure, in particular for small $n$, large $p$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.