Paper detail

Sharp minimax tests for large covariance matrices and adaptation

We consider the detection problem of correlations in a $p$-dimensional Gaussian vector, when we observe $n$ independent, identically distributed random vectors, for $n$ and $p$ large. We assume that the covariance matrix varies in some ellipsoid with parameter $α>1/2$ and total energy bounded by $L>0$. We propose a test procedure based on a U-statistic of order 2 which is weighted in an optimal way. The weights are the solution of an optimization problem, they are constant on each diagonal and non-null only for the $T$ first diagonals, where $T=o(p)$. We show that this test statistic is asymptotically Gaussian distributed under the null hypothesis and also under the alternative hypothesis for matrices close to the detection boundary. We prove upper bounds for the total error probability of our test procedure, for $α>1/2$ and under the assumption $T=o(p)$ which implies that $n=o(p^{ 2 α})$. We illustrate via a numerical study the behavior of our test procedure. Moreover, we prove lower bounds for the maximal type II error and the total error probabilities. Thus we obtain the asymptotic and the sharp asymptotically minimax separation rate $\tildeφ = (C(α, L) n^2 p )^{- α/(4 α+ 1)}$, for $α>3/2$ and for $α>1$ together with the additional assumption $p= o(n^{4 α-1})$, respectively. We deduce rate asymptotic minimax results for testing the inverse of the covariance matrix. We construct an adaptive test procedure with respect to the parameter $α$ and show that it attains the rate $\tildeψ= ( n^2 p / \ln\ln(n \displaystyle\sqrt{p}) )^{- α/(4 α+ 1)}$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.